Wikipedia:Peer review/Melodifestivalen/archive1

Melodifestivalen

I've been working on this (nearly alone, but there are a couple of other editors out there who've made good contributions) for what's felt like ages now - it must be the best part of six months - to the point where I feel someone else's perspective is desperately needed. I'm particulary interested in any feedback regarding the history section (is it too long?), referencing (is there enough?) and general prose (which I don't consider myself an expert on). As you can imagine, it's been difficult to find really good information in English on the topic on the web. Comments on anything would be really useful. Chwech 19:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should preface these comments by saying that I'm hardly experienced where Peer Review etc is concerned, but the history section actually seems to read quite well. There's a fair amount of detail in it, but it's hardly too long as far as I can tell. If I remember over the next couple of days, I'll have a look through the prose more carefully and see if there's anything in need of attention, but a cursory glance doesn't show up any mistakes there either. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Everything should be referenced. At the moment this is not the case. You should put them directly after a comma or a full stop, without a space. I changed a few of these. Is there any info you can put in there about media coverage and how large it is. But yeah, to get it to featured articles, the use of English has to be very smooth and there are links at User:Tony1 for some tutorials and exercises. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, you don't need to state ESC in full each time, since it is unnecessary in context. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for the comments. I'm looking into getting the official book of MF which should help on the referencing. I agree about the English, and will give the article a run-through to improve. Chwech 17:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]