Wikipedia:Peer review/Microsoft Office/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.
Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ( talk / contribs)
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked.
- As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark.
- The {{prose}} tag, well, make the article satisy the manual of style and remove the tag.
- Filled with {{fact}} templates. Add references and remove them.
- I would recommend using (although not required) {{citeweb}}, {{citenews}} etc. for the references.
- The {{expand}} tags - expand the sections.
- That's all for now... « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie ( talk / contribs) 22:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)