Wikipedia:Peer review/Monarchies in the Americas/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I recently got this article to GA status. I asked an FA regular to take a quick peek to see if he'd recommend taking this to peer review before attempting to get it to FA status and he answered affirmatively. I'd be very grateful for input of any kind. Thanks! :) Cameron* 14:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Bot's comments
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for January 2009.
Eustress' comments
Here are some suggestions and things to fix:
- One link is dead and several others have connection issues (see Checklinks).
- Per WP:CAP, captions only end with a period if the text is a complete sentence (e.g., fix Cuauhtémoc, Mohawk Kings, etc.) Done.--Cameron* 18:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Some publishers are wiki/external-linked in the citations while others are not—need to be consistent
- All words in some citation titles are capitalized while others are not—need to be consistent
- Do you really need six citations to support "Suggestions of change have been raised in the Commonwealth realms in regards to the order of succession..."?
- Inline citation should follow punctuation mark in "The monarch is represented in the territory by the Rigsombudsmand..."
- You might consider outsourcing the table in section Current monarchies to List_of_monarchs_in_the_Americas#Current_monarchies—it's a bit overwhelming in this article. Done.--Cameron* 18:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Overall, a nice-looking, well-sourced article. Best wishes --Eustress (talk) 03:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)