Wikipedia:Peer review/National Park Community College/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for March 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to GA status, but am not sure which direction to research/expand it in.
Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: Here are a few suggestions for improvement.
- You asked for ideas for expansion. WP:WikiProject Universities/Article guidelines#Article structure includes a good list of possibilities that I think would help you. The existing article focuses on the history of the college. Other sections might focus on the campus, organization, academics, and student life.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities/Article guidelines#Example articles lists many university and college articles that have achieved GA or FA status. For example, Ashland Community and Technical College is a community college article that is rated GA. It and the others on the list would give you more ideas about how to proceed.
- The statement about the AAUP censure is intriguing, but it would be helpful to include a brief summary of the specific issues involved.
- You might include a bit of the history of Quapaw Technical Institute.
- I especially wanted to know more about the students and more about what they are studying.
I hope these brief comments prove helpful. Finetooth (talk) 03:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)