Wikipedia:Peer review/Neuro-linguistic programming/archive1
"Everything can be dealt with on this article. NLP is not rocket science. The principles are explained very well on this article already. HeadleyDown 02:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)"
The editors of this article has spent 8 months collecting evidence and have been compiling an exhautive list of references from scientists' opinion on the subject. The time has come to request for peer review. --Dejakitty 13:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- The clutterring references in the middle of the article makes it difficult for readibility; they should be converted properly into inline citations. AndyZ 00:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oh wow, great job with the converting. However, several of the footnotes are blank (probably has to do with an error with the ref name attribute; remember that the content for a doubled footnote should be placed under the first occurrence of that ref), and there are quite a few typos: [[.]] [http:// Science. See if an image can be added to the righthand corner of the lead, at the front of the article.
- Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, years without full dates should not be wikilinked.
- If possible, convert the lists into prose; for example sections like "Common patterns", etc.
- Alphabetize the interlanguage links at the bottom. AndyZ 19:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)