Wikipedia:Peer review/Neuroepithelial cell/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the other contributors Guru and Spencer and I would really like to get it up to snuff with some of the other assorted neuroscience pages, at least so it's no longer a stub, and possibly GA status.
Thanks, Leomagrini (talk) 03:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments - absolutely state right now that I'm no expert, but this review will be technical and hopefully useful!
- Lead is too brief, it should summarise the article - see WP:LEAD.
- If you use abbreviations (like CNS), make sure you put them in parentheses after the first use.
- And avoid using them in section headings.
- Nothing major, I guess this is a USEng article, fetus just looks wrong to me!
- Induction is a disambiguation link.
- Suggest you link "invaginates".
- "and the basal side is oriented outward," replace and with while.
- "neural tube" is overlinked.
- "hree distinct regions of growth.[3][1] " order the refs numerically.
- Should "self renew" be hyphenated?
- "antiproliferative gene" and "proliferative" - any decent links for these?
- Why not "During the G1 phase" rather than just "During G1..."?
- "them multipotent - a definite distinction " should be an en-dash, not a hyphen. Check other instances.
- Link mitosis.
- "On a whole, neurogenesis" what does "On a whole" add to this?
- "o be seen. [6]" remove space before ref.
- "Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumors are a rare, benign tumour" no need for the capitalisation and you have "Tumors are a rare, benign tumour..." mixing up the numbers plural/singular...
- "children and teenagers under the age of twenty" pretty obvious that teenagers and children are under 20.
- " little to no long term" normally would expect some hyphenation.
- "the ages of 20-50 " en-dash required.
- Image caption is in bold, why?
- " problems [10]." -> "problems.[10]"
- Glucocorticoids - is this a proper noun?