Wikipedia:Peer review/Parliament of Australia/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I have made substantial edits and expansions to this page over the last few months and I would like some feedback on how the article is going and how it can be even better!
Thanks, Superegz (talk) 08:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Comments from J947
[edit]I'll review this. J947(c) 02:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Lead
- There should be no citations in the lead as per WP:CITELEAD.
- Infobox
- I've removed a few spaces.
- It is very long. You should shorten it by at least a third.
- First paragraph
- I've added the serial comma and removed a space.
- WP:OVERLINK should be followed for the 'Australia' link.
- This sentence:
The combination of two elected Houses, in which the members of the Senate represent the six States and the two self-governing Territories while the members of the House represent electoral divisions according to population, is modelled on the United States Congress.
, is rather long and should be split up.
- This sentence:
- Second paragraph
The upper house, the Senate, consists of 76 members:
, should use emdashes instead of commas surrounding 'the senate'.
- History
The Commonwealth of Australia came into being on 1 January 1901
. Any reason why? It just seems too much of a coincidence...
After the official opening, from 1901 to 1927,
. An emdash should be used.
- Old Parliament House
- There shouldn't be links in headings.
- First paragraph
- Again, emdashes.
- And, again. :)
- Second paragraph
was commenced on 28 August 1923[12] and completed in early 1927.
Comma.
@Superegz: Ping for you. J947(c) 19:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
@J947: Thanks, I will have a look at this later when I am free. Superegz (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)