Wikipedia:Peer review/Placenta/archive1

Placenta

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because... this article isn't perfect, but I'd like to eventually get it to GA. I haven't edited this particular article much, and would like the input of other users on what areas need work to get it there, as it is sometimes easier to have a definitive list. Specific, definite and "actionable" points would be most appreciated.

Ping to Flyer22, who has worked with me in the past on these reproductive system-related articles.

Thanks, LT910001 (talk) 10:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Tezero

The article seems biased towards human placentas.
Is there a source for the statement about the two plurals of the word "placenta"?
Lots of short paragraphs around. Also short sections that may be better off merged together if expansion is not possible.
Some unsourced statements as well.
"Structure" in particular seems wanting of expansion.
Similarly, "Clinical significance" should be retitled to something more representative of its contents, and should also be significantly expanded with regards to each disease mentioned.

Tezero (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I'll try and get to these in the next week or so. --LT910001 (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]