Wikipedia:Peer review/Poitou donkey/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it was just promoted to GA and I'm considering taking it to FAC. Thoughts on comprehensiveness and readability (especially any equine jargon) would be especially appreciated. Thanks, Dana boomer (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hi again Dana. If you look at the French version of this article, there's three books listed in the Bibliography there. I think you might have to make an effort to get your hands on these to help fulfill FA criteria 1b and 1c. Cheers, Sasata (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm, you are quite right. I had looked at the French article but had apparently not scrolled down far enough to see those. I have a French equine editor that I frequently work with - I'll have to ping her to see if she has access to those, as it looks like they're all in French. Thanks for pointing these further sources out. Dana boomer (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Note: I'm archiving this because of the time it will take me to get the refs that Sasata pointed out. Without these, there's no point in going to FAC, so a PR right now is unnecessary and a drain on reviewer resources. Dana boomer (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)