Wikipedia:Peer review/Porcupine (album)/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've substantially re-written it over the last few weeks and I'm aiming to nominate it for GA status.
Thanks, JD554 (talk) 13:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Giggy comments
- This isn't far off GA standards.
- The audio sample captions need more detail, to show how they're being used educationally (and it needs to relate to the text).
- Fixed
- Some of the reviews in the reception section aren't in the infobox... be consistent.
- Fixed
- First sentence of article should mention genre.
- Fixed
- "it became the band's highest charting release when it reached number two on the UK Albums Chart despite initially receiving poor reviews." - probably put a comma before 'despite"
- Fixed
- "Following a difficult period writing Porcupine, it was recorded at Trident Studios in London, Rockfield Studios in South Wales and Amazon Studios in Liverpool." - I think it'd read better if you removed a bit... "following a difficult writing period, Porcupine was recorded..."?
- Fixed
- I hope these comments help. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Cheers, giggy (:O) 03:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, --JD554 (talk) 06:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)