Wikipedia:Peer review/Princeton Tigers men's basketball/archive1

Princeton Tigers men's basketball

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am going to nominate this at WP:GAN and want to prepare it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few quick comments:

I assume this is being presented as a list, not an article?
- I am not sure if it should be a list or an article. Most of these college team articles are not lists. I guess I better overhaul the page so it is more proselike.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What is the use of the redlink immediately over the infobox?
- We were hoping for a season article while the team was in the post season. Most of these team articles have a link to the current season.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Licensing of the logo is inadequate. The image does not "only consist of simple geometric shapes". The all-important factor is the specific coloring pattern.
Something is up with the connection to ivyleaguesports.com. Refs 5, 6, 7 and 9 all return page not found messages.
- They moved their server. I will try to check some archives.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
William Roper leads to a dab page
The rash of redlinks in the lead disfigures the page. But anyway, why is it necessary to list 15 names in the lead? The object of the lead is to provide a summary overview, not this level of detail.
- I addressed this.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The table in the Arenas section is completely empty.
Ivy league table: Does "Pct." mean "per cent"? The figures in the column are not in percentage form.
"Bradley has won numerous distinctions as a Princeton Tiger. He is the team's only Rhodes Scholar". That is not a distiction that he won "as a Princeton Tiger".
- I don't understand this point.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - The Ivy League Media guide lists Rhodes Scholars in its year by year summary.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Far too much "See also"

Something to work on, anyway. Brianboulton (talk) 18:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a history section if you even want to think about GA. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 23:54, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the Postseason section, the "Field size" parameter should be deleted. How about replace it with "seed"? ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 23:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]