Wikipedia:Peer review/Public Sphere Pedagogy/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
A couple of us have been working on this article for the last few weeks. Looking for feedback in terms of quality, WP style, and areas needing expansion or improvement.
Thanks, Ryanx7 (talk) 18:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Comments from mvblair
- As it is, the article is very insular, although it would appear to be noteworthy. It has a lot of unapplicable jargon that could be cleaned up. It's got a lot of original research, and should probably be tagged as such; I wonder if the editors aren't actually involved in the origins or practice of the topic of Public Sphere Pedagogy. It reads a little like a research project for a class. The connections between PSP and Town Hall Meetings, The Great Debate, and The Student Voices Program need to be made clear because there is no explanation about what those three things are. There is no need to emphasize specific words in the article through italics. Other than that, the article seems to have some good sources, even if they are insular, and seems to be relevant to a circle of regionally-based education theoreticians. Mvblair (talk) 11:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)