Wikipedia:Peer review/Ralph Bakshi/archive2
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for February 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has failed six FA nominations in spite of overwhelming support and only minimal changes required.
Thanks, Ibaranoff24 (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments by Carcharoth
[edit]A few brief comments (will take a closer look later):
- Peer review archiving is messed up: see my comment here.
- Resolved - this was a misunderstanding on may part.
- Please link to the six failed FAC nominations.
- I found the links at the most recent FAC nomination: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ralph Bakshi/archive6.
- Is Ralph_Bakshi#Filmography the normal approach? Is it not normal to at least have a summary?
- I see MSJapan removed the previously existing summary in this edit. Will ask them about this.
Will add more as I read the article and copyedit it. Carcharoth (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- It has its own article (which is tagged in that section), and Bakshi's major films are mentioned within the article already, so a summary is a bit redundant at that point in the article. MSJapan (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe, maybe not. I'd personally look at how other "film director" articles handle this issue. It currently looks a bit silly as a section with a main article link and nothing else. I'd put it as a "see also" or remove altogether (it is linked from the template, isn't it?). Carcharoth (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Done. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 01:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC))
- Maybe, maybe not. I'd personally look at how other "film director" articles handle this issue. It currently looks a bit silly as a section with a main article link and nothing else. I'd put it as a "see also" or remove altogether (it is linked from the template, isn't it?). Carcharoth (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Additional review found here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Ralph Bakshi. Carcharoth (talk) 04:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. I've found time to look in more detail at the section dealing with the Lord of the Rings film that Bakshi did, and one thought I had was that something of the later comments made by Bakshi about other films (he did some interviews around the time of the Jackson films) could maybe be incorporated somehow? That might help balance things out a bit and give some insight into Bakshi's views over time. Not much else to add, as the article looks pretty good. My advice would be to go through all the reviews and make a detailed summary of the objections and either work out a way to address the objections, or explain clearly why you think the objections are not valid. Carcharoth (talk) 00:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)