Wikipedia:Peer review/Real Madrid C.F./archive4
Appearance
I think the article is good enough to be a featured article.Saudi9999 06:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- And what exactly is the point in just saying that. One example why it isn't: "The club won the European Cup for a sixth time in 1966 defeating Partizan Belgrade 2–1 in the final with a team composed entirely of nationally-born players, a first in the competition". Not properly punctuated. And I am presuming you have read the Featured article criteria? Mattythewhite 09:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- And please take a look at my comments on the previous PR. Mattythewhite 18:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Angelo
[edit]A short introduction: this place is not for discussing about featured article, but for requesting a peer review to this article. Here is my PR, in any case.
- Use stadiums rather than stadia;
- Done renamed. Saudi9999 03:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Some parts of the article refers to the team using they, some others use it. So, be consistent and use only one of them (I'd suggest the former).
- The crest collection's picture looks like a derivative work featuring copyrighted logos (which are usually not allowed to be used in derivative works). I am unsure about its validity in the Wikipedia.
- Be consistent also with the season notation: use solely 2007–08 rather than 07/08, for instance.
- Real's kit is currently manufactured by Adidas, which is contracted to supply the club's kit since 1998. Can you please source this?
- Source also the team captaincies.
- Done removed. Saudi9999 03:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bernd Schuster's picture smells like copyvio. I will have a look at that very soon in any case.
- Done removed. Saudi9999 03:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Format foreign words such as "socios" in italics.
Here's all. I hope my suggestion are useful for you. --Angelo 18:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- About Schuster's photo, I was right: it's taken from sport.es, and is therefore a copyvio, so I deleted it. --Angelo 21:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 19:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)