Wikipedia:Peer review/Reginald fitz Jocelin/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to take this article to FAC at some point, and would appreciate help with jargon, and prose.
Thanks, Ealdgyth - Talk 14:36, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
- The lead does not give any indication of his date of death, which is known. The lead also should be at least two paragraphs per WP:LEAD. Also any guesses as to when he was born?
- Some sources say that he was born while his father was studying law in Italy. needs a ref
- I think the article needs more background on the whole Becket affair to provide context for the reader - see WP:PCR Also provide things like the year of Becket's murder.
- Aaaah, dad, do I gotta? I hate Becket ... WAY too much time spent listening to a fellow student drone and drone and drone about him... (sniffles and looks pitiful). In a more serious vein, not a problem. Just take a bit of time... which I seem to be running perpetually short of... Ealdgyth - Talk 03:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Might also want to mention the name of the previous archbishop of Canterbury and when he died. Other than these, this looks pretty good.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)