Wikipedia:Peer review/Reputation (album)/archive1

Reputation (album)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to take this to FAC in consideration of the bronze star. I have considerably expanded/rewritten this article and meticulously examined the available sources to craft the current prose. Any and all comments are very much appreciated.

Thanks, Ippantekina (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ippantekina: This has been open for over a month without comment. Are you still interested in receiving feedback? If so, I suggest asking for feedback on the Wikiprojects attached to this article or from regular FAC nominators in music topics. If not can this be closed? Z1720 (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Z1720, thanks for the ping. Let me ask for feedback from FAC contributors and if I see little chance I'd close this soon. Ippantekina (talk) 04:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aoba47

The source link for File:Taylor Swift 043 (18117777270).jpg is dead. The source and author links are dead for File:Antonoff in Tucson (cropped).jpg. Just wanted to group both of these together as they deal with the same error.
The WP:FUR for File:Don't Blame Me by Taylor Swift song sample.ogg says that critics mention this song as representative of the album, while this is not represented in the actual caption for the audio sample. The caption is more focused on the song rather than justifying its inclusion in the album article. Just to compare the caption for the "Delicate" audio sample does this very well.
Apologies in advance if I missed this. I looked through the sources, and I was curious if you looked into scholarly articles and coverage on the album (like through Google Scholar). I have not looked myself so there may not be anything, but I was wondering if you had looked for these kinds of sources?
I have a quick question about the Eras Tour mention near the end of the article. For this part (tribute to all of Swift's 10 studio albums up-to that point), but according to the article, there doesn't appear to be much if anything with her debut album. I know this is more outside of the scope of this article, but I was just curious on how it was paying tribute to that album?

Unfortunately, I will not be able to do a full review of the article. My primary point of this review was the first three points (i.e. pointing out issues with the images and audio sample and asking about the possibility of scholarly coverage), while the fourth point is more of a clarification question for something I noticed along the way. Sorry that this peer review has not received much attention, but I hope these comments are at least somewhat useful. Best of luck with the future FAC! Aoba47 (talk) 17:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, Aoba47. I understand this article is quite too long for a serious Peer Review, so hopefully I could sort things out for a future FAC. Will act on your comments accordingly :) Ippantekina (talk) 05:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding and take as much time as you need. Aoba47 (talk) 13:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ippantekina: It has been over a month since the last comment. Are you still interested in receiving comments? Z1720 (talk) 03:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be closing this PR at this point. Hopefully it'll get better luck at GOCE... Ippantekina (talk) 07:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]