Wikipedia:Peer review/Rural diversity/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it's a recent creation and I'd like additional opinions on how it could be improved.
Thanks, Joecipsurprise (talk) 16:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hey @Joecipsurprise: from a quick read-through of the article, I had the following comments:
- It strikes me that the article is focused entirely on the United States. I wonder whether the article should incorporate a broader world view of the topic, or perhaps if the concept is limited to the US, it should be moved to Rural diversity (United States).
- There appear to be several statements and sentences which do not cite any sources, I would suggest that these parts are given immediate attention.
- The Media Portrayals section is relatively large and appears ahead of the, in my opinion, more relevant explanation of the different types of rural diversity. I would suggest the Media Portrayals section be condensed or at least moved after the more important sections explaining the subject of the article itself.
- This article is largely an explanatory article and so perhaps some images, diagrams and/or graphs could be used effectively to assist the reader in understanding and comprehending the article.
- That's all I have for now, I hope it's of some help. —Ave (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- That's very useful, @Ave:, thanks! Joecipsurprise (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)