Wikipedia:Peer review/Semper Fi Fund/archive1

Semper Fi Fund

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because: I would like to see more well-run charitable organizations with Wikipedia articles. Social Science and society was not a perfect fit, but it was the closest of the choices given.

Thanks, Gouncbeatduke (talk) 23:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gouncbeatduke: I think your references should be books or articles from newspapers. Your current references are their website and two directories. It doesn't show if it has received external coverage from independent media and if it is anyway relevant enough to be in the wikipedia. Hope this helps. --JordiGran (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Csisc

The topic is good. However, the first origins and the history of the organization should be specified and expanded well and its great successes should be cited with comments from the audience. --Csisc (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]