Wikipedia:Peer review/Sense and Sensibility (film)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to see how near it is to FA status. I've been working on this one on and off for over two years, and would like to nominate it for FA soon. Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated (are there any major gaps, is the prose OK? etc.). Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 19:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- My goodness, I rarely come across a popular media article of such high quality! The writing is superb, the organization is excellent, and the amount of quality sources indicate a lot of research went into writing this article! I don't know how much of the work is yours, but the article's contributors have done some great work on it. I'm not here just to provide praise, as this is a peer review request. There's not much to say, and I could only find one problem after a full read-through, so I'm getting quite nit-picky;
- In the first sentence under the "Reception" section, I found that thee phrase "indicated critical acclaim" seems to cut the flow of the sentence by separating "which" from its subject, Rotten Tomatoes. Might I suggest that you simply delete it (as 98% seems to indicate critical acclaim all by itself), or find some other way to move it?
Excellent work. I think this is definitely ready for an FAC. Good luck!--haha169 (talk) 05:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for taking the time to review! I agree with your comment and have trimmed the "critical acclaim" part. Feel free to write here or ping me if you think of anything else! Ruby 2010/2013 05:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)