Wikipedia:Peer review/Sex effects of water pollution/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it appears to be a heavily biased discussion of the subject, with article references to questionable / pseudoscientific sources. Might be worth deleting if other pages cover the topic sufficiently.
Thanks, —Hobart (talk) 15:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment: If you have basic issues with the article you should first raise these on the article's talkpage, or directly with the article's main editors. You could also ask for an appraisal from an appropriate WP science project. Peer review is not a means of resolving disputes or of making the kind of assessment you think is necessary. I am closing this review as inappropriate. Brianboulton (talk) 22:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)