Wikipedia:Peer review/Sheffield United F.C./archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am considering nominating it for Good Article status, and would be interested in knowing what needs to be improved. It has previously been rejected for GA twice in 2006 & 2007, but I feel it's in far better shape now than it was a relatively long time ago.
Thanks, Half past formerly SUFCboy 11:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Had a quick look through the article and think that the main problem is in the referencing of the material.
- There are a number of cite needed tags in the text that need addressing.
- Some sections are unreferenced such as "Shirt sponsors and manufacturers"
- There are a number of dead links in the references that should be addressed
- Ref 48 is a bare link and needs some detail such as title, publisher, date of publication & accessdate adding
- On the book references some use pp. for a single page rather than just p.