Wikipedia:Peer review/Slackers CDs and Games/archive2
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I recently got this article up to GA status, now what would need to be done for FA?
Thanks, Me5000 (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: I think this is a long way off from FA and am a bit surprised it is a GA. Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
- Article is a bit short, while this is not a FA criterion, comprehensiveness is. This just seems way too short.
- Article needs a copyedit - contactions should not be used for FA (professional prose is an FA criterion) so spell out "it is" (not "it's"), while in other places the possessive "its" is spelled incorrectly as "it's".
- Lots of one or two sentence paragraphs that should be combined or perhaps expanded.
- Do the sources all meet WP:RS?
- A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow - Elderly Instruments is an FA on a small local music based business and may be a good model article.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)