Wikipedia:Peer review/Snooze (song)/archive1

Snooze (song)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

Hello! I have listed this for PR with the intent of FACing it in the future.

Thanks, Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 02:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dxneo

Hello PSA, decided to tackle this as soon I set my eyes on it since I know you're an excellent writer. Let me know if you disagree with any of my suggestions. Please do ping me when you FAC the article.

All refs are wikilinked and archived, except for ref65, which is a tweet that might get deleted at any given time. Suggestion: since it's a Billboard chart and they usually preserve their archives, isn't there a way you can cite the actual Billboard domain? And also use Archive.today or Ghost Archive to archive social media posts
- Done archiving. There are no year-end lists for Hits of the World charts on Billboard websites, to my knowledge, so the ref will be kept
Ref118 is also an unarchived social media post which I cannot verify if it's reliable or not. Archiving the would be good, but citing the chart from a reliable source or official website would be perfect.
- Thanks; fixed the archive link. The Facebook page is reliable - this press release PDF uploaded on their official website links to the same Facebook page. Unfortunately, the FB ref will have to do, since RIM seems to have started publishing their charts only this year [1].
As for ref154, I think it's better to use Apple Music instead of Amazon Music per this discussion. Thoughts?
- I don't agree. The discussion you linked began because there were small cracks on AM's reliability on releases. (weeks ago I found this random "SZA collab" listed on her AM profile, but it was just someone who sampled a verse from a leaked song. You are to bring this up on that discussion or any other appropriate venue.) Both the AM and Amazon links are reliable IMO considering they're on her lnk(dot)to.
Since there are other versions of this song, I think adding a tracklist would me amazing. Thoughts?
- Per Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music/Archive 8#RfC on Track Listing sections in song articles and Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs#Single track listings, it is not a necessity.
I could be wrong, but I thought the alt text was for visually impaired people. If it is, then how does "Justin Bieber perform in a 2016 concert in Poland" help them make out the colour of the picture and so on?
- Indeed it is. However, the purpose of alt texts is context-based. The image is there to show a picture of Bieber and nothing more, so it does not provide a visual description; contrast this with the cover artworks.
Alt text: Cover art for the acoustic version: SZA and an unknown man running towards each other in a large grassland ===> Cover art for the acoustic version: SZA and a man running towards each other in a large grassland.
- Trimmed. nice catch

dxneo (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@dxneo: Thank you so much for your helpful comments

and the compliment! I'll be sure to remember this interaction fondly. I hope these responses address your concerns. Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 16:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing this in timely manner. You the best. dxneo (talk) 16:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, not sure how I missed this, but could you please wikilink |magazine=Billboard on refs 136, 140 and 142. dxneo (talk) 18:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@dxneo: Done. Thanks, Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 02:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan620

I was asked off-wiki to take a look at this article a couple weeks ago – I had intended to review the GAN, but was beaten to the punch by an editor who did a great job with the review. So, here I am! This was a predictably great read, though I do have a few comments:

jealousy and intense desire can greatly destroy them – bit of a nitpick, but I'm not sure if "greatly" is necessary here.
The turnaround time for their song was quick – Should be "short" instead of "quick". (This was called out in our FAC for GitM, which had the same issue.)
- we co-FAC'ed it and I still didn't catch this mistake... shit man - E
Blanco in the lawn – "on" would work better IMO. ("in" makes me imagine him growing from the soil like a plant.)
propelled from last week's number-42 position – this reads like it literally happened last week when that obviously isn't the case; recommend rephrasing as "the prior week" or something similar.

That's all I've got! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylan620 helpful as always

for more context the request was from the unofficial WP:DISCORD server. No worries about giving nitpicky energy; what else is PR for :P all should be addressed Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 ^{[please make some noise]} 02:15, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]