Wikipedia:Peer review/So Seductive/archive1

So Seductive

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've done extensive work on it, and I feel it could be GA worthy soon. Please be honest with criticism, as I don't mind if it makes the article better.

Thanks for your time! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 10:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this. --Noleander (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Noleander

I'm basing this PR on the GA criteria at Wikipedia:Good article criteria
~~If possible, 1 or 2 pics should be added. If none are not available, that is okay.~~
~~Past tense: "and is produced by record producer Punch," - I think "was produced" is better.~~
Overall the prose looks fine ... I'm not seeing any big issues. For GA recognition, I think it is adequate.
The citations are more than adequate, so the Verifiability requirement is met.
I don't see any bias in the article, so the NPOV requirement is met.
No edit wars are in progress. so that is not a problem.
Lead looks good.
Conclusion: It appears to meet all the GA criteria. I suggest that you nominate it at WP:GAN. It looks like it will have, at most, a few minor prose issues to resolve.

End Noleander comments. --Noleander (talk) 15:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having fixed the issues you have stated, I think I will put it to WP:GAN. Thank you for your time! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 15:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]