Wikipedia:Peer review/St. Nicholas Monastery Church, Mesopotam/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because significant additions have been made to the page.
Thanks, Rob Sherratt (talk) 01:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Comments from KJP1
[edit]An interesting building and an interesting article. Some suggestions:
- Images - there are some nice shots, and architecture articles are always improved by images, but there are way too many! The text runs like a column between them, making it hard to read. If you must have them, stick them in a gallery at the end.
- Citations - there's quite a lot that's completely uncited. The general "rule" is for a minimum of one cite per. paragraph.
- Prose - I've made some minor prose amendments, rather than listing them here.
- Tags - there are a few tags that need dealing with.
- Original research - as the tag over the Dragon Icons section indicates, you need to show that the content isn't your original research. Who says the bull is "possibly" Paris etc., and can these be cited to wheresoever the claim is made? And what does "The following information may be co-incidental" mean?
It's certainly well beyond Stub class. Best of luck with it. KJP1 (talk) 06:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)