Wikipedia:Peer review/Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones/archive1

Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones

I've been working on this article for a while, taking it slow. I recently got the Revenge of the Sith promoted to featured status and am looking to do the same here. The article is formatted and written (in some ways) in the same way the Episode III article and would like some input on anything I might have missed before I submit for FAC. The Filmaker 19:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles).

Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.

As per WP:MOSDATE, dates shouldn't use ^th; for example, instead of using January 30^th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.

Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
- allege
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please ~~strike~~ this comment).

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 20:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've run down the article to see if could find any ways to correct these points and have found none. Sorry, Andy. The Filmaker 02:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Whoa...no mention of awards. Awards section needs to be added, possibly as a sub-heading of Reception. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 07:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Wow, either I'm stupid or just absent minded. Thanks for reminding me. The Filmaker 16:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done and done. The Filmaker 16:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]