Wikipedia:Peer review/Supracondylar fracture/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to contribute information on supracondylar fractures to the public. I hope this article will give a better on sight on what a supracondylar fracture is and how to diagnosis it. Some sections that may need reviewing are the mechanisms and the diagnosis
Thanks, Jcmalimban89 (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- This article definitely needs more citations, particularly to peer-reviewed journal articles. Google Scholar turns up 6,000 hits for the subject. As a rule of thumb, every statement in the article should be supported by a citation.
- Try to avoid one- and two-sentence paragraphs. The Patho-anatomy section, in particular, should be expanded.
- Similarly, try to present material in full-sentences rather than lists.
- If you do need to use lists, they are created by placing an asterisk (*) at the beginning of each entry.
- I don't believe that PhysioAdvisor.com can be trusted as a reliable source. Their objective is not to provide neutral, peer-reviewed information; it is to sell products.
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is a Featured Article, might be a helpful model for how to expand this one.
Feel free to contact me if you need more assistance. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 00:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)