Wikipedia:Peer review/Ted Cadsby/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because...
I worked with Ted Cadsby to redesign his website and offered to post information about him on Wikipedia. He provided all the content and I vetted, assembled and published this article. We have done our best to include extra citations where possible to validate Ted's description, and have worked to ensure his entry is within the WikiProject Biography and biographies of living persons. We want to find out how to have the qualifying banner at the top of this page removed or adjusted to reflect sincere efforts to make this a neutral, correct and worthy article.
Can I get some direction please on what to do or how to get assistance so this article does not convey a sense of suspicion or lack of credibility? Otherwise, I have also asked about assistance draftifying or otherwise moving this article to a space where more time can be spent to get it up to article standards/requirements.
Many thanks, VickiZ (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The article is borderline a candidate for WP:AFD. Beyond publications by the subject himself, I can't find too much that indicates this subject meets WP:GNG from a quick search. The article also has many WP:OR/WP:SYNTH problems, being based overly on primary sources. In fact, it overall so poor, that the only reason I haven't sent it to AfD yet is because it's too late at night for me to do a proper search for acceptable sources. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 05:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @VickiZ: Since this article was deleted following a WP:AFD, I would encourage you to close this peer review. Aoba47 (talk) 17:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- What is the best way to do that, @Aoba47:? VickiZ (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @VickiZ: There are instructions on how to close a peer review on this page (Wikipedia:Peer review/guidelines). Aoba47 (talk) 18:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, @Aoba47:.