Wikipedia:Peer review/The Big O/archive1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Peer review. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
I'd like to know how The Big O article rates right now, (it's been classified as Start-class for too long) and what needs to be done to improve it further.--Nohansen 15:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- A lot of the article doesn't appear to be written in an encyclopedic style - "... and the American fanbase asked for more", "But Jason DeMarco, executive producer for Season Two, doesn't think it can happen.", "There's no denying the similarities between Batman and The Big O." - it reads a lot more like an anime review than an encyclopedia article. Work needs to be done on that. -ryand 14:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Is that it? Am I done?--Nohansen 20:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Too many fair use images. The JPStalk to me 22:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Looks good, and I like lots of images. Too much bold font, if I were to nitpick :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Removed bold font where it seemed like "too much." By the way, what does "Too many fair use images" mean? Because User:Piotrus "like[s] lots of images" --Nohansen 14:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Looks good too me, except i think there are way too many links in the article. When I was browsing the article it looked like someone just linked every word they found with an article. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)