Wikipedia:Peer review/The Big Room/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because i'd like to nominate it for GA but would like some feedback first as I am the only major editor. Thanks. Freikorp (talk) 13:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- The article looks in good shape but there are some things bothering before thinking of nominating to GA.
- Expand this the lead to at least two paragraphs per WP:Lead
- Release and promotion is quite big. I'd recommend to split thinking what is each paragraph about (imagine you are writing a formal letter)
- Since critical response seems to be mostly positive I would suggest with an intro sentence like "The album received positive critical response with x"
Other than that, I didn't notice other issues. Any doubt just ping me. Also, I made my own peer review here. I would appreciate feedback. Good luck.Tintor2 (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I've attempted to address all these concerns. Freikorp (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)