Wikipedia:Peer review/The Scott Mills Show/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm really just looking for ways that I can improve the article. I have made quite a few changes to the page and I think they are improvements but is there anything I can take out or add to make this a better article? Please let me know your thoughts, they'll be much appreciated.
Thanks, TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- The article lacks citations. There are a few, but there really should be ones that reference every statement. It also needs a thorough copyedit. A lot of sections are very short as well - could they be expanded? Best, -- how do you turn this on 20:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- The lead is also for a summary of the whole article - it currently reads more like a mix of facts randomly thrown together. -- how do you turn this on 20:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I think I need to echo the above, really. Not enough citations; most sections are a tad too short; lead needs slight re-writing. Also, the history section currently reads more like a history of Scott Mills himself than this show. Having said that, this is a fairly solid start for an article, and in all honesty (citations aside), it could be brought up to a very high standard fairly quickly. Good work thus far! TalkIslander 18:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)