I've listed this article for peer review because…
Let's make it worthy of being featured in the main page!
I think it fulfills all criteria of an FA!
Thanks, Yoichi Tachibana (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is eligible for PR, the nom is not a major contributor to the article. Keep in mind that FAC requires inline citations for all content outside lead and plot sections. (t · c) buidhe20:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
