Wikipedia:Peer review/United Nations Parliamentary Assembly/archive1
Any suggestions for improvement of this article? It's kind of a hard subject to write about, given that it doesn't exist yet, but I've made some progress. 24.54.208.177 05:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- It's really good. I particularly like the fact that you do a great job citing all of the important information, as well as give a good overview of the major debates about how this Parliamentary Assembly would be constituted. If anything, I'd just say keep monitoring the news on this, as well as keeping up on all other possible major debates and anything else that would help frame the debate. One thing to look at, probably because just because they do have some major sway at times over the UN, would be what the current United States government, or those associated with the government, are saying about the possibility of a UN Parliamentary Assembly. I'm not saying to focus on that, but just mention it, if there is information out there on it (I'm not sure there is, but it's just something I started thinking about while reading the article... if I misinterpreted it, you can disregard the last point) Jlove1982 04:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- I've been looking for formal U.S. positions or statements by U.S. officials about a UNPA, but so far I haven't been able to find anything. 205.217.105.2 17:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
- An image or two never hurt anybody y'know. Perhaps you should make an easy to understand graph out the statistics in the Apportionment of votes section. Paul Carpenter 20:46, 17 December 2005 (UTC)