Wikipedia:Peer review/WAP (song)/archive1

WAP (song)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I intend to nominate it for FAC.

Thank you, --VersaceSpace 🌃 15:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. This sentence on James P Bradley seems unnecessary unless Bradley is particularly notable in this context? I would delete "His response was criticized across social media, with users finding his criticism of the rappers as role models for young women hypocritical due to his support of Donald Trump." The next sentence about Bradley's premise being untrue seems good to me. This keeps the article more focused on the song rather than Bradley's presidential support. I also not that Bradley does not have a WP.

2. The commercial performance section gives a lot of background on other chart toppers. This seems a bit excessive to me.

Overall this is good. I do not have have a lot to add. Czarking0 (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done —VersaceSpace 🌃 15:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]