Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Argentina/archive2
Appearance
I would like to nominate this portal to featured some day, but before that, I would like to know if there is some important issue that might need fixing. Cambalachero (talk) 04:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to go ahead and review all open PPRs, having a whole comment-less peer review page...bothers me. Overall: nice work, a few nitpicks and a couple of things that need expansion. ResMar 16:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- The link to the topic outline is probably better placed within the introduction.
- For the news section, to avoid maintenance overhead (and crosslink to our other projects), I think you should use the Argentina Wikinews content. It looks outdated, however, so I'm not sure whether this is a good idea, or how it's implemented if it is (something to do with bots).
- Portal:Argentina/Selected picture - so many good pictures! I dunno, I think most people prefer these be randomized as opposed to ran monthly - less maintenance overhead. Your choice, however.
- Picture of the month needs an actual frame, thumbs are ugly.
- Some of the anniversaries seem sparse (only one event, as opposed to five on another day). Are there no other stories to add?
- Did you know should be consolidated into six-part hook lists, not left alone as they are. Try going to Wikipedia:Recent additions, editing the page, and keyword searching "Argent"; I remember for Portal:Volcanoes I searched "Volc."
- Topics should be framed in some way, it breaks the style to have it simply "out there". Also, I think Topics would be better placed below Other portals.
- What about Featured work?
Thanks for the advises, I will work with them in the following days Cambalachero (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)