Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 7

< January 6	January 8 >

January 7

Template:WashingtonDChomicides Map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WashingtonDChomicides Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template with barely readable links. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nearly unusable and orphaned anyway —Crazytales (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WashingtonStateCougarsQuarterback

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WashingtonStateCougarsQuarterback (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template with a somewhat narrow scope. There is already a list of notable players in the Washington State Cougars football article. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Weapons of Bulgaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Weapons of Bulgaria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned navigation template, not sure if there is any planned use. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just forgotten to place it on all respective articles. In any case, it's not a template that will constantly change or expand, therefore I'm against. - ☣Tourbillon ^A ? 19:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can withdraw my nomination if it is de-orphaned Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Western Australia politics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per db-author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Western Australia politics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as creator/only editor. I think I had a purpose in creating it, but I can't remember for the life of me what it was. Orderinchaos 19:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Actors in Law & Order: Special Victims Unit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Actors in Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per current consensus, actors should not be included in template boxes. However, this template is nothing but a list of actors who have been regulars or recurring in Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. A removal of all actors names from this template would leave a completely blank template. Therefore, the only reasonable course of action is deletion. Redfarmer (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is a standing consensus against this type of template, and good reasons for that consensus. --RL0919 (talk) 17:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Southern Europe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Southern Europe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template which is redundant to {{Countries of Europe}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant to a template that is already used on all the relevant articles. --RL0919 (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Australasia tundra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australasia tundra (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Australasia temperate coniferous forest (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with only one subarticle. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. Not enough links to be a helpful navbox, and most of the links are already in the article bodies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RL0919 (talk • contribs) 12:15, January 13, 2010

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Trivia-now

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trivia-now (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

1. Orphaned. 2. I saw somebody trying to use it today, and it is broken (not that it would be hard to fix it). 3. Redundant to {{Trivia}}. 4. We do not automatically add dates to templates (although it is not a bad idea). Debresser (talk) 13:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Di-no author

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Di-no author (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nothing in the deletion criteria or image policies states that the author of a file must be provided, only the source and copyright status. Stifle (talk) 10:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. it is in use on only 2 files. Anybody know why it was created in the first place? Debresser (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Confirmed-

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Confirmed- (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template of questionable utility. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Use of a talk page message box to support one side of an editing conflict (which is the only likely use of this template) is not a good idea. Thankfully unused. --RL0919 (talk) 03:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Clickurl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Clickurl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template with documented accessibility problems. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and apparently abandoned, with no talk, no links and no edits since it was first created in 2007. --RL0919 (talk) 16:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Plastikspork. Jrcla2 (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:City race

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:City race (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:City area (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned templates Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, and the standard infobox used for cities has fields for including area and demographic information. --RL0919 (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Nepal Zone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Nepal Zone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template which is redundant to {{infobox area}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant to a widely used template. --RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Asturian municipality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Asturian municipality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 November 2#Template:Infobox Spanish city and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 October 24#Template:Infobox catalan city, this template is redundant to {{infobox settlement}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and redundant to a widely used template. --RL0919 (talk) 03:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MakeCCalso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 15:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MakeCCalso (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, and seemingly associated with image migrations now performed by other processes Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Delete. Unused, and the wording of this one is outdated, making future use unlikely. --RL0919 (talk) 03:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Incompatible_GFDL_Version

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per CSD, as template is unused and nom is template author

Template:Incompatible_GFDL_Version (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned, and seemingly associated with image migrations now performed by other processes Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AddinfoforCommonsMove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per CSD, as template is unused and nom is template author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AddinfoforCommonsMove (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, intent was to provide a means whereby 'bad' stuff had some review before it got moved to Commons, what actually happened was the creation of yet another backlog, which has only been cleared recently. Also with current 'gadgets' not known about at the time of it's creation the need for this template is much reduced. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cross wiki import

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per CSD, as template is unused and nom is template author Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:34, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cross wiki import (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, In any case cross-wiki imported image should be on Commons Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.