Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 23

< September 22	September 24 >

September 23

Template:Conflicts in Romania and Moldova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TajikPersian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TajikPersian (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No benefit over {{lang-tg}}/{{lang-fa}}. — Lfdder (talk) 17:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't really see the purpose of this one. It links to two alphabet articles, but anything that uses this template should only be using one alphabet. The two alphabetic spellings should be separated with separate templates prefacing each spelling. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Transliteration scheme side boxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Malayalam transliteration (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tamil transliteration (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tulu transliteration (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Panachaiki sections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Panachaiki sections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Further to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 September 16#Template:Panionios sections - this template only has one blue-link, and it is unlikely that the other red-links will ever be independently notable from the sports club they are departments of. It therefore serves no purpose as a navbox. Giant Snowman 16:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete handled by the see also section and standard article links. Frietjes (talk) 16:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only two articles, and this only links to one article. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox cultural center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox cultural center (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use on Centro Cultural de Ponce Carmen Solá de Pereira, can be replaced by Template:Infobox organization. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete or redirect, was replaced here. Frietjes (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Transfer accomplished. Mercy11 (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox landslide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox landslide (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use on 1996 Yosemite Valley landslide, it shares all parameters with Template:Infobox news event (which is used for all kinds of disasters), except for debris_weight and fall_speed, which could be added to that template, either directly or as blank fields. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it was created to solve this problem, but go ahead and convert it to use another infobox. Frietjes (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced here.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 17:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete then. — Lfdder (talk) 17:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Ukrainian oblast divisions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Texas regional council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Seetal railway line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Seetal railway line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use on Seetal railway line, should be substituted and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then do it. The template can be then speedily deleted per WP:CSD#T3. As can be most of your today's nominations, actually. Keφr 10:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CSD T3 takes at least a week, a TfD might actually be faster for these templates. And there is always the possibility that someone might object.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So does a TfD, except in rare cases of WP:SNOW keeps. And a user can still object by removing the speedy tag, or better, by invalidating the criterion. Keφr 11:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Until May this year, the template contained just the expandable route diagram, transcluded from within an Infobox in the article. This is a fairly standard situation for railway line articles. Then, for some reason and without explanation, an editor moved the infobox into the template. So should we revert to the pre-May situation, or should we substitute the lot (including the expandable line diagram). Personally I'd vote for the latter, apart from the fact that I've tried it several times (on other articles) but never managed to get it to render the infobox correctly. If you can, great. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 11:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I merged it into the article before seeing your comment. Is that what you had in mind? — Lfdder (talk) 12:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Exactly what I had in mind. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Route diagrams should be in their own templates so that it is not necessary to edit an entire article just to make a small change on the diagram. Useddenim (talk) 04:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I had put the infobox into this diagram because I was encountering a formatting error. This has now been fixed, and the original, correct configuration (infobox on article page, RDT transcluded into infobox) has now been restored. Useddenim (talk) 04:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is perfectly normal to have the code for a RDT kept out of a railway line article and in many cases it is also used in related stations. Secondarywaltz (talk)
- Keep. Secondarywaltz is correct. There are more than 1,000 rail route diagram templates similar to this one, and they all fulfil the useful and desirable purpose Useddenim describes. Bahnfrend (talk) 05:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The code of an RDT is kept out the article to improve readabity and to reduce the risk of the technical template code being changed at same time someone does a simple change to the article. Edgepedia (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Useddenim and others. I wonder WTF the nominator is thinking of and how they think this sort of deletion improves the encyclopedia? RDT templates are vicious little beasts and neither they nor inexperienced editors co-exist well within article bodies. Is "Delete all single-use templates" now a policy? Andy Dingley (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. The Wikipedia:Template namespace guideline: "Templates should not do the work of article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article." The current wording of that sentence dates back to November 2007. Keφr 14:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Then that piece of dogmatic stupidity needs fixing ASAP. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Raised at Wikipedia_talk:Template_namespace#Delete_all_single-use_templates.3F Andy Dingley (talk) 16:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Note that the operative word here is "text". Replace text. This is not text. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until a reasonable alternative is available. As Andy Dingley explained above, putting the wikitext into the article would be extremely unhelpful. There is no rule at Wikipedia which must be followed, and supporting the deletion of this template for the sole reason of "single use" demonstrates a lack of familiarity with WP:5P, among other things. Issues like this should always be resolved by considering what outcome would give the maximum benefit to the encyclopedia. If someone wants the RDT to be removed from train articles, that needs to be taken up elsewhere. Meanwhile, the wikitext must not be in the article. Johnuniq (talk) 06:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox op1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox op1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only use in userspace, if really necessary OP-1 could use Template:Infobox synthesizer for his user page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:OP-1 Synth reads like an article in userspace. — Lfdder (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That article-userpage and this template were the only contributions of that user -PC-XT+ 02:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
move to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 22:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox television bowling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox television bowling (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only for Bowling Revolution P-League, rather than fork Template:Infobox television it would be better to use a simple floating table to add any additional information. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I created this template just for this article is that, unlike other television series, this show has been moved around three times. None of the other templates allow me to show all three time slots, and the dates/episode numbers for each of them. I'm not a template expert, so unless someone can modify Template:Infobox television... BTW, this template was copied from the Japanese Wikipedia, and the Japanese version of Bowling Revolution P-League uses it. Groink (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with {{Infobox television}} as for moving timeslots around, it should only display the current timeslot, so if the series is no longer aired, no timeslot should be indicated, and instead the text of the article should indicate the timeslots. Many TV shows have their timeslots changed through their airing histories, several even change networks. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can this template be kept for another week or so? I'll work on it this weekend. I just don't have time at the moment. Thanks! Groink (talk) 20:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

once discussions close, links to the templates go into WP:TFD/H until there is a chance to replace them. Frietjes (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

replace with {{infobox television}}, and potentially create a module if there are missing parameters that should be supported. Frietjes (talk) 17:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Script/Greek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Script/Greek (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Purely stylistic (there isn't a modern OS without support for Greek characters) and overwrites user fonts when used inside {{lang}}. — Lfdder (talk) 10:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On my browser, I found the default font used to display Greek was not very legible. For example α looks rather too much like the letter a on my browser, but α looks better. I now use {{Polytonic}} instead since that seems like a standard thing, but now that I look this seems to be zero improvement over using no template at all, at least for α. I go for the "mostpeople" solution. user fonts are kind of exotic. Can you fix it so user fonts are not ignored? My usage is completely for ancient Greek rather than modern Greek. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Polytonic was deprecated last year; you shouldn't be using it. Either way, polytonic transcludes {lang|grc| ... } (the template that's replaced it); {lang|grc} sets the HTML lang attribute for text you throw at it to "grc", and nothing else. This means that you can use :lang(grc) in your user style sheet to change the font for everything that's grc-tagged to one you like, with no effect for other people, like so:

   :lang(grc) {
       font-family: "DejaVu Sans", sans-serif;
   }

In general, you should not make other people's font choices for them -- that is, unless they'd otherwise not be able to view text in that script, like with Cuneiform. — Lfdder (talk) 15:14, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but what percentage of users set a custom font? I like to make things obvious for people. They often are just skimming through things, and the Greek not looking like Latin calls attention to the shift in language. With another language based on a Latin alphabet, I would probably use italics, but Greek is so different, my preference is to shift fonts to something that makes it clear it is not Latin. This is my preference as an editor trying to communicate to others as well as I can. I agree that if you have gone to the trouble of setting a custom font, that should take precedence, but as an editor, I should be able to change the default for users who haven't gone to this trouble, who I think are most users. So I think the best solution would be to make the template so, while it changes the default, doesn't override any user preference. So put me down as Keep. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean that you want to make it stand out? There's a difference btn that and making it "obvious". Your preference as an editor conflicts with mine as the reader. Whose should take precedence? It overrides user pref by default; my pref is the font I've set in the browser. — Lfdder (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bob, are you suggesting something like adding an internal span with no style, but lang=grc that can be styled by user preferences? That might be interesting... I'm on the fence, but watching for comments -PC-XT+ 09:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the exact function of {{lang}}. Also, I don't see where Bob might have suggested that. — Lfdder (talk) 10:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. This would be a wrapper for {{lang}}. The only difference would be style changes. I'm still on the fence. I took Bob to mean this when he said, for instance, "I think the best solution would be to make the template so, while it changes the default, doesn't override any user preference." -PC-XT+ 10:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what the benefit of that would be. You can just as easily place this one inside {{lang}}. Have you read my reply above? — Lfdder (talk) 10:35, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not yet know if there would be a benefit, which is why I am on the fence. If this template were placed inside {{lang}}, would it not keep the user preferences you gave above from overriding its inline styling? -PC-XT+ 11:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would work with !important. However, my concern is with the true user (browser) default. — Lfdder (talk) 11:16, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And, for the record, I think the default font (Arial for me) is perfectly legible, and I like to see Latin and Greek in the same font. — Lfdder (talk) 15:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as part of the {{script}} system, and that all non-Latin-ISO-1 scripts should be available under it. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

and your reasoning for that is? — Lfdder (talk) 07:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep because not everyone uses a modern OS. I happen to know of people still using 15-20 year old machines to connect to the Internet and view Wikipedia. It is true that these are few, but they exist and to delete it because we think everyone should be using a modern OS/browser that supports them would be a poor reason on our parts. Technical 13 (talk) 12:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How is this template gonna help those people? They've not got a modern OS but they're gonna have DejaVu Sans or Palatino Linotype? And what are the implications for other writing systems and also for the Universal Language Selector? — Lfdder (talk) 12:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template's talk page says it was created "to provide custom image headings for a coin, Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar, whose obverse/reverse designation is ambiguous." It would be better to change Template:Infobox coin to accommodate the article's requirements, but if this is not possible it should be substituted and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

replace with {{infobox coin}}, but add a feature to that infobox which will allow for custom Obverse and Reverse headings. Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge As the author of the FA, Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar, I need the template or something that will do the same trick, as which side is obverse (heads) and which reverse (tails) is a matter of dispute. Note the discussion on article talk page. Please do not delete it without a replacement or something that does the same trick. If you go ahead and delete and no one changes infobox coin, I shall be royally pissed.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Replace and Delete clearly a single use template, and we already have {{Infobox coin}} with which this is essentially redundant. Per Frietjes, the coin infobox can be expanded. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until a Merge has been successfully implemented. Seems to me that calling the template 'essentially useless' at this point overlooks the fact that it is 'currently' 'technically' serving a purpose. {{Infobox Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar}} presently provides functionality — which is presently missing from {{infobox coin}} — to the Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar article. Albeit in a 'kludged-together-hack-work-around' single purpose way. If someone with more skillz/experience than I would care to be proactive and 'bell-the-cat' by adding the ability to toggle and/or otherwise modify how/whether {{infobox coin}} displays "Obverse"/"Reverse" info and imagery I'd be fine with removing {{Infobox Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar}}. But not until such a merger of function has been successfully accomplished. ~~Please, let's do this without breaking a WP:Featured Article.~~ --Kevjonesin (talk) 23:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- article now updated here. Frietjes (talk) 23:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks Frietjes.

Remove/Delete — I'm the user who initially created {{Infobox Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar}} and feel that at this time it has served it's purpose and may now be deleted as User:Frietjes has kindly modified Template:infobox_coin to make it more accommodating by extending it's functions and updated the article accordingly. Well done Frietjes. --Kevjonesin (talk) 22:33, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox coin 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox coin 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not sure why this is needed when there is a Template:Infobox coin 1, but it's used on only 10 articles. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:17, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge with {{infobox coin}}, looks like there may be a couple missing parameters, but nothing that merging could not fix. Frietjes (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete per Frietjes. As someone who works with coin articles quite a bit, I don't see that this template is useful. If there are any good ideas, incorporate them into infobox coin.
Merge and delete per Frietjes -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
now merged. Frietjes (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete providing the effected articles have been adjusted before deletion. --Kevjonesin (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox motorsport round

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Assassins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moved to User:GMoneyWCAR/Assassins -PC-XT+ 03:12, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Assassins (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a template, should be either userified, moved to mainspace or deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

move to Assassins (band) and send to AfD, or delete per {{db-band}} if the lack of notability is clear. Frietjes (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox per nom, clearly an article sitting in templatespace. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy to author's userspace, clearly still a draft. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox ATS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox ATS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and in any case redundant to Template:Infobox organization. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete redundant to {{infobox organization}} or {{infobox non-profit}}. Frietjes (talk) 23:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Yogasana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:03, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Yogasana (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use, should be subst'ed and deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:05, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete The infobox is coding for a location infobox, complete with location map, elevation about sea level, etc. This should clearly not be substed into the article, as that mess of coding is useless. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, replaced with {{Infobox asana}}. Frietjes (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox film actor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox film actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox actor works for all kinds of actors. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to {{infobox person}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox artist module

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox artist module (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Possibly a fork of Template:Infobox artist, used only on Lukas Pawlikowski. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete as a fork of {{infobox musical artist}}, which already has |embed= for using it as a module. I replaced it in the article. Frietjes (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If it can be emdeded, then OK. Kill my baby. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 10:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox wikiproject software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox equestrian championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox equestrian championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Either this or Template:Infobox Equestrian Championships should be deleted, and perhaps they could both be replaced by a more generic infobox. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Template:Infobox equestrian championship; but Speedy Keep Template:Infobox Equestrian Championships - I agree there is no need for both, and the latter is clearly better put together. I don't agree on a generic infobox; I think there is sufficient structure and similarity to equestrian competitions, whether stand alone or multievent, different from other generic sports competitions, to justify a separate infobox.

It provides a useful summary in table form of salient points that someone looking at an equestrian comp page would like to know, espially thinhs like horse and riders. As a general rule, generic sports infoboxes rarely allow for enough 'specialist' or event specific information specific to that sport, unless the sports follow a very broadly similar structure - say all the various football or rugby codes, or various martial arts codes.

I can imagine an infobox for, say, motor sport or sailing or even cycling - any events involving races for individuals and teams by means of propulsion other than simply the athlete - might contain some usefully similar functionality, but building a generic box in such a way risks losing more than you gain.

Mpjmcevoybeta (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox electric racing car

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox electric racing car (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fork of Template:Infobox racing car. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. You can replace it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Confederation of Indian Industry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Confederation of Indian Industry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The only article on which it appears should use Template:Infobox organization. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:55, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I have updated Confederation of Indian Industry to use the standard {{Infobox organization}}. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox architect and artist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under T2. This is not a template exactly. It is a a copy of Infobox architect with all parameters set to fit a single person. Magioladitis (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox architect and artist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We already have Template:Infobox architect and Template:Infobox artist. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Suresh Apex Bhandari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suresh Apex Bhandari (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

User:Suresh Apex Bhandari could use Template:Infobox user for his user page instead. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox biathlete

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 1. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Timeline of marijuana decriminalization in US

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Timeline of marijuana decriminalization in US (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William 12:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mohit Kumar yadav = Infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mohit Kumar yadav = Infobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not sure what this is about, but it's unused and it should probably be deleted. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete Frietjes (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2007 Indiana Fever depth chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2007 Indiana Fever depth chart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only ever used on one page. subst and delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge with article, then delete. Frietjes (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008 Indiana Fever depth chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 Indiana Fever depth chart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only ever used on one page. subst and delete. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge with article, then delete. Frietjes (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.