Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 12

< May 11	May 13 >

May 12

Template:Eddie Sharp Racing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:21, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eddie Sharp Racing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Team is now defunct; navbox is unused and unneeded now. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Andrea England

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:03, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Andrea England (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 4 items apart from the eponymous article Andrea England, so it fails WP:NENAN's minimum threshold of 5. Of those 4 pages, 2 (Colin Linden and Nicole Scherzinger) are not defined by their relationship to Andrea England. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:$1Billion Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:$1Billion Films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Infobox with list of unrelated films, seems more appropriate for category, if anything at all. $1 billion milestone somewhat arbitrary - List of highest-grossing films seems sufficient. Fru1tbat (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can probably dump it. There is no reason to assume that someone on The Dark Knight page would want to then access the Toy Story 3 page. As a "piece" of information, we have a chart listing the billion-dollar grossers on the high-grossing films list, and that is all that is really required IMO. Betty Logan (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Along with being an arbitrary number it makes no allowance for exchange rates, inflation etc. As Fru1tbat says the list article is the right place for this info. MarnetteD | Talk 01:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Taxonomy/Odobenus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Nomination withdrawn with no conflicting arguments. Rlendog (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Taxonomy/Odobenus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Incomplete taxonomy template that better could be finished in someone's more private workspace. The Banner talk 09:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The template had been vandalized on 11-May-2014, breaking it. The vandalism has been reverted and it is working properly. Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deal, did not notice that. Nomination withdrawn. The Banner talk 12:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:North American League Ballparks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. If you want to create one with a larger scope, go ahead. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:North American League Ballparks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The North American League has been defunct for several years so there are no current stadiums, thus this template is unnecessary. Spanneraol (talk) 00:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reworking this to cover "the ballparks of the former North American League Ballparks" can do the trick already... The Banner talk 10:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.