Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 24

< May 23	May 25 >

May 24

Template:Calm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Calm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Calm talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Calm with Template:Calm talk.
Two templates for virtually the same thing. ({{calm talk}} has many more transclusions, but I think {{calm}}'s name and text are better.):Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say I agree. "calm" reads a lot better without assuming that uncivil discussion will take place. I also think that if this is done, "as we try to resolve this issue" should be rewritten to be "as issues are resolved". The way it currently reads sounds like a section header for a specific issue. However, in the page I saw this being used, it was as a talkpage header generally talking about all discussions on the page. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 00:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Even though the first four transclusions of the {{Calm}} template are used as talk page headers, I found that the 5th one, Talk:Massimo family, uses Template:Calm as it was meant to be used, i.e., as a section header. So if these two are merged, the wording will have to fit both talk page header and section header. Something like:

Please be calm and civil when you make comments or when you present evidence, and avoid personal attacks. Please be patient as we work toward resolution of an issue in a peaceful, respectful manner.

– Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 06:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support "Calm" is less to type and less to remember.—Auric talk 11:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Makes sense to merge them. I also support Paine Ellsworth's proposal above. RGloucester — ☎ 04:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.