Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 20
April 20
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Useless unused template of literally Everything. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused template; scope would be way too broad. APerson (talk!) 05:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Correct about broad scope. Hajme 09:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hard-coded citation template. It only has some parameters, allows some other parameters to parse through and other parameters would create an error. Unnecessary complication and with this and this edit, now orphaned as well. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Why it was even created? Hajme 09:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
unused wrapper. Frietjes (talk) 19:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete unsed template. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete too big and unused. Hajme 08:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete this monstrous megatemplate. Neutralitytalk 19:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Various Hemingway navboxes
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Template:The Old Man and the Sea (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:A Farewell to Arms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:The Killers (short story) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:The Sun Also Rises (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:To Have and Have Not (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:For Whom the Bell Tolls (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.