Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 4

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Human prehistory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. 28bytes (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Startnowrap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox tram network/body (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History subcategory see-also (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

overly complicated template for only two categories. Frietjes (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sammi Cheng (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

currently only connects two articles, Sammi Cheng and Sammi Cheng discography. the rest are redirects. Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment a bunch of articles were redirected on 1 March 2015. I find it surprising that there would be no articles on any Sammi Cheng material, considering her fame. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 07:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • None of the albums had any sources and contained nothing more than track listings, so they now redirect to the discography page, which also has no sources, unfortunately. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 22Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensusPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AtariAge title (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Citation template that is just a shortened version of cite web used in three articles. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Balch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Citation template used in just one article. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite IFSG Impact DB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Somewhat intricate template that is just cite web with some parameters pre-filled out. Only on two articles and seems to add confusion to editors rather than simplify things. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AHSCharacter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Note: I somehow deleted my own rationale but this serves no purpose and we should just link directly to redirects. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any way to speed this discussion up? KoavfFrietjes I don't mind if it's deleted or not, I don't really have an opinion on it. But see American Horror Story: Freak Show, the entire article is covered in deletion notes. Gloss 16:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Koavf: @Frietjes: Anyone? There's a few articles that look like messes right now.. Gloss 14:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Gloss: The best way to speed up the discussion is if the creator consents to deletion. —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:54, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well as I said, I don't have much of an opinion on this so I would rather let others decide. But I suppose there is no way to let the discussion continue without these pages looking like such a mess? Gloss 06:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Gloss created this template and has now started using redirects to the List of American Horror Story characters, which is what should've been done in the first place or not at all. None of the characters, in time, will be notable enough to have an article, in my opinion, and this and the redirects just take up WikiSpace, which is burdened enough on busy visitor days. — Wyliepedia 19:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be fine with deletion if ya'll are willing to help me out making the redirects. Gloss 20:37, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.