Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 April 21

< April 20	April 22 >

April 21

Template:Seattle Sounders FC U-23 squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure). ~ Rob^Talk 00:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Seattle Sounders FC U-23 squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We only create squad templates for clubs that are fully pro. This is an amateur club. – Michael (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-professional club doesn't need template. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - to clarify for @Mikemor92 and Joseph2302: - the 'non professional' rule does not apply to squad templates, all that matters is whether or not there are enough bluelinks to justify having a navigation template. In this case it does not. Giant Snowman 07:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well every link on the template is to someone whose article is being discussed at AfD, and so they'll all be redlinks soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Deaths date and age

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Deaths date and age (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Almost qualifies for G2 or G6...? Orphaned Template created by a very new user, intended obviously for Prince (musician). As it stands, the template is unable to be used and is not able to be customized in any way. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 17:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually genuinely curious whether this meets speedy criteria to get this particular template taken care of faster. — Andy W. (talk · contrib) 17:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Semitic topics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted here. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 00:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semitic topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This classification is outdated by many decades. See Semitic people for sources. Oncenawhile (talk) 20:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Magic: The Gathering players

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted here. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 00:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Magic: The Gathering players (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is misuse of a template for a category and list which already exist (Category:Magic: The Gathering players and list of professional Magic: The Gathering players). This template doesn't provide more specific criteria (such as, for example Template:NBA MVPs does, being a template not of basketball players in general but specifically NBA MVPs); instead, this template is a generic list that is attempting to list MTG player articles on Wikipedia. There's a reason we don't have templates of such genericity as a "basketball players" or "football players" template that is just a list of basketball player and football player articles on Wikipedia: the number of people/articles fitting such a template is constantly growing over time, to unwieldy sizes better served with a category. The template will be frequently out-of-date unless constantly manually synced with every new article, and whenever it does not match up with the category, the POV problem arises of why certain players are listed on the template but not the category. Category:Magic: The Gathering players already does what this template is trying to do, and does it better (more up-to-date with less maintenance required and with more fairness). —Lowellian (reply) 02:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (and not a !vote): Per WP:CLN this is an example of a bad navbox. Maybe there is another criterion which could be used to organize this template, such as when the players started playing, were born, how many wins they have of a major tournament.... --Izno (talk) 01:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:NOTDUP, the argument that it duplicates the list and category isn't a reason for deletion per se. I'm pretty sure nearly half of the mtg player articles aren't even notable anyways, so it's possble that we could be looking at a much smaller navbox that would be easier to organize.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- (Just for the record, User:Prisencolin is the creator and primary editor of this Magic: The Gathering players template.) If the player has an article on Wikipedia, then presumably, they are notable (if the player is not notable, then the article should have been deleted, per Wikipedia's standards requiring that biographical subjects be notable), in which case, it is POV and biased to arbitrarily exclude them from the infobox. That is one of the fundamental problems of this infobox: it cannot stay neutral without constant maintenance and monitoring that catches every new player article created. It is not even a fair infobox now, excluding multiple players who have articles on Wikipedia. —Lowellian (reply) 23:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).