Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no parent article. if needed for a wikiproject, can be housed in project space. Frietjes (talk) 22:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

content should be moved to a proper section in the parent article, rather than hiding it in a navbox at the foot of the article. Frietjes (talk) 22:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 October 30 ~ Rob13Talk 02:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirectPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This template does nothing. JbhTalk 19:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by 78.26 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed & contains non-English text; unclear how it would be used. : Noyster (talk), 12:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge as discussed. ~ Rob13Talk 02:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing. Contains only one subsection of called acid types and Template:Acids and bases also contains a subsection of called acid types, but with different content.

The information contained in both places should be merged together into one template. Comfr (talk) 18:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the section, "Number of hydrogen ions," to the Template:Acids and bases, so it now contains all of the information in Template:Acids. Comfr (talk) 02:59, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).