Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 19

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, replaceable by {{PD-USGov}} FASTILY 23:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. I discovered Category:Specific-source templates. (non-admin closure) Triptothecottage (talk) 01:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Five transclusions. I can't find any policy to support maintaining a template for the sole purpose of citing one source across a small number of articles, and quite frankly I'm not sure what the point of it is. Triptothecottage (talk) 23:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Borg- and Ferengi-story templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete per precedent, but willing to re-open/relist if requested. Primefac (talk) 01:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in a previous discussion about Klingons and Vulcans, these categories are not well-defined. How Borg does an episode need to be in order that it be considered a Borg story? Does the appearance of Seven of Nine sufice? A similar question can be considered for the Ferengi template - should Caretaker appear due to the scene in Quark's bar? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).