Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 3
September 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Carmit Bachar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Doesn't navigate anything. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:48, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia.AlfaRocket (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, the villages in the district are already included in Template:Parbhani district villages, so this is partially redundant to that template. Could be merged with that template? Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- unused, I find it not good and not important for wikipedia.,if it was the opposite it would not be here on the cancellation page.AlfaRocket (talk) 11:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
unused Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia.AlfaRocket (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, could be history-merged with Template:Namespace and pagename-detecting templates Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- unused, I find it not good and not important for wikipedia.,if it was the opposite it would not be here on the cancellation page.AlfaRocket (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:39, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
unused Frietjes (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- unused, I think this is not too much relevant in wikipedia.AlfaRocket (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).