Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 5

< August 4	August 6 >

August 5

Template:Fb rbr t pos Mexico Women

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 02:14, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb rbr t pos Mexico Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Fb rbr t pos Mexico Women/c (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{Fb rbr t pos}} and unsustainable to make a new one of these for every league and every time the cutoffs change Frietjes (talk) 18:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fbc rbr t pos 12

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fbc rbr t pos 12 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{fb rbr t pos|p=4|r=15}}; it's unsustainable to create a new one of these everytime the cutoffs change Frietjes (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only 3 pages about Chinese Super League before 2012 season are using this template, and those pages can be further improved without this template. I'm the creator of this template and I agree to delete it. Since it looks similar to an existing template, I'll start to edit those 3 pages by changing another existing template. Phenolla (talk) 18:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete G7 Hhkohh (talk) 03:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant template, easily moved to an existing template. SportingFlyer talk 01:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb rbr t pos China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb rbr t pos China (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Fb rbr t pos China/c (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{fb rbr t pos|p=2|pp=3|r=15}}; it's unsustainable to create a new one of these everytime the cutoffs change, and problematic since editors frequently change the cutoffs for new articles which screws up older uses. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is redundant to the initial "fb rbr t pos" template with parameters set. And very few pages use this template, so even if being deleted, it'll not take some time updating those pages affected. Phenolla (talk) 18:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template:fb rbr t pos for preserving history. Previous version is different. Hhkohh (talk) 03:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. As an aside, is there a way to add a pp2 and rp2 options to the base template? It would make redundant a number of other templates. SportingFlyer talk 01:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes Hhkohh (talk) 02:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hhkohh (talk · contribs) Any ideas on how would I get started updating this? Thanks! SportingFlyer talk 03:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - SportingFlyer Maybe open a merge discussion for these templates in TfD is better Hhkohh (talk) 03:21, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - SportingFlyer, see this thread at WT:WikiProject Football. Frietjes (talk) 12:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).