Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 February 16

< February 15	February 17 >

February 16

Template:1966–67 AAWU Conference men's basketball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1966–67 AAWU Conference men's basketball (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template, duplicate of Template:1966–67 AAWU Conference men's basketball standings. Bigcheddar (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1966–67 Pacific Coast Conference men's basketball standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1966–67 Pacific Coast Conference men's basketball standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template, duplicate of Template:1966–67 AAWU Conference men's basketball standings . Bigcheddar (talk) 22:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1986–87 Pacific 10 Conference men's basketball standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1986–87 Pacific 10 Conference men's basketball standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template, duplicate of Template:1986–87 Pacific-10 Conference men's basketball standings. Bigcheddar (talk) 22:20, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete, clear duplicate. Frietjes (talk) 17:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlanta United 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlanta United 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

duplicate of Template:Atlanta United 2 squad Joeykai (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete beyond the fact that this is a duplicate, templates for second teams are usually not maintained, but rather incorporated into the first team's template. This template isn't needed. Jay eyem (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dead to Fall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dead to Fall (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Band navbox. The people in this navbox all have no articles. The four albums don't really need a navbox. Sandstein 19:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Navbox has four albums which was not connected without the navbox. The ensemble plans to release a new album in 2018. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, plenty of links. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 18:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Metro Dagupan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Metro Dagupan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Dagupan is no longer a metropolis as per definitions by the National Economic and Development Authority -ERAMnc 08:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Pokémon X and Y

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/Pokémon X and Y (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This game was released over four years ago. The game only occasionally has news articles written about it and there is no information that could be leaked anymore. While it might have been useful in 2013, it is now superfluous. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lakes of Kenai National Wildlife

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:14, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lakes of Kenai National Wildlife (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unmaintained list of mostly redlinks. I’ve nominated the only three with articles at AFD as these lakes are all in an area that is more lake than land and they are not really notable, so this will almost certainly soon be nothing but redlinks. It may be possible to have a navbox for this subject, but this ain’t it. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD was relisted, but looks likely to end in a decision to delete. It should close on the 18th. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd rather have the TFD close after the AFD is finished. Relisting mostly for that purpose, though obviously more input would be grand.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- insufficient navigation & not everything needs a nav box. The entries appear to be insufficiently notable; they are up for deletion, with the discussion trending "Delete". Delete regardless of AfD outcome. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:44, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Navigation template for which all navigation targets have just been deleted. The template is now unused. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Julius Evola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Julius Evola (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The quantity of articles about Evola has fluctuated pretty wildly since this template was created, but they've constantly lacked reliable sources establishing notability. After a year without improvement, I just turned Le Parole Obscure du Paysage Interieur into a redirect to Julius Evola. This leaves only three articles remaining. One of those also has tags for its serious notability problems. There isn't enough left to bother with a navbox. Grayfell (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- insufficient navigation & not everything needs a nav box. The entries appear to be insufficiently notable in any case. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USL Premier Development League Southwest Division stadiums

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 1. Primefac (talk) 14:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Southwest_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Southeast_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Northeast_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Mid_South_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Mid_Atlantic_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Heartland_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:USL_Premier_Development_League_Great_Lakes_Division_stadiums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New Zealand Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New Zealand Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; 2nd place squad (squad membership is preserved in 2006 ICC Champions Trophy squads). See 25 July 2017, 29 December 2016, 18 December 2014, 8 December 2014, ... Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete confirmed it's unused. Mamyles (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; unused. Steven (Editor) (talk) 00:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Now I have inserted this template into those cricketers' biographies who have played at the 2006 ICC Champions Trophy. It is also a useful template. Abishe (talk) 16:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per @Abishe: (thanks for the work). Useful navbox for notable ICC tournament, nothing to do with examples mentioned above. Störm (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 00:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, navbox creep. We don't need navboxes for every squad; especially squads that didn't win the trophy. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We don't need navboxes for every intricate little detail. Ajf773 (talk) 09:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, It is one of the most useful templates as it relates to the ICC Champions Trophy. Abishe (talk) 11:00, 24 February 2018 (UTC). Removed double vote. Ajf773 (talk) 19:58, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons outlined by Plastikspork. They didn't even win the trophy, if we keep this then people will end up creating ridiculous templates for all teams at all ICC tournaments. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).