Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 July 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 11

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 23. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused NHL templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. See also June 28 TfD (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting all of these templates. These templates are not used anywhere and the only links are between them. In addition, the WP:NHL project does take minimal approach towards the visual appearance of infoboxes, tables, game logs or other hardcoded content. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These were made for use by Callmemirela and Hockey project members. I just built the templates and adjusted the module. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. What WP:NHL project members do you have in mind? You should always consult the project before creating such templates since we take minimal approach towards visual appearance. That is one of the reasons of why we do not create templates for Stanley Cup-winning teams and other things (head coaches, team captains, draft picks and others). – Sabbatino (talk) 07:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I haven't heard about these templates in a long time. So I apologize for the minimal details I have right now. I remember wanting templates for the NHL season articles because nearly every article was inconsistent in the details of a match. One would include both home and visitor in a single line and another would only include the visitor team and if they were visitor include an @. Some would use the goalie, some didn't. It was very inconsistent, messy and all over the place frankly. I don't remember how I approached the idea to where. I want to say the WikiProject but I could be wrong. I remember that no one was replying to my inquiries until someone chipped in weeks later. Mr rnddude was the one to create the templates as I have no experience in creating templates. And I think that's where it stopped and died down. That's all I remember from this. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 16:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No oppose (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, has exceeded its usefulness.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  05:03, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 23. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).