Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 10

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Vanamonde (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken (frames do not define an args2 table) duplicate of Module:Purge. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:57, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The doc page was made today by me when I nominated the module. The actual module was created in August. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Broken; would be implementable in Wikitext if it worked. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals has been notified of this discussion. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Now the articles exist, the premise for deleting has been removed. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; the two links redirect to the main article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree.--Anbans 585 (talk) 22:04, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. RL0919 (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the creator of this template was trying to create an infobox instead, but in any case, as he is trying to create a promotional page for his company (Draft:Mikro Mac) and it's entirely in Spanish, the draft is likely to be declined and this template is completely unnecessary and creating a template loop. Richard3120 (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that speedy deletion existed for templates, so thank you to TenPoundHammer for alerting me to it - I support the speedy deletion option. As I explained above, the creator appears to have wanted to use {{Infobox company}}, so even in the unlikely event of his article being accepted for creation, this new template will never be used. Richard3120 (talk) 18:08, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; replaced by Module:Sports results Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the table in Albania#Demographics Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; all the other Led Zeppelin album navboxes were deleted Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; probably because the individual album navboxes were deleted Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

out-of-date; current clubs are in Template:Paraguayan División Intermedia Frietjes (talk) 13:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates the the map in the article Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Medals table. Consensus to merge, if Zackmann08 if able to make it work successfully without significant loss of functionality. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:MedalTable with Template:Medals table.
While not identical, it seems like this template can be merged? Worth at least discussing. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question Looking at how they are used, I wonder how you want to merge them. The former is used to list number of medals for each sport in games (i.e. no rank and nations), and the latter is used to list number of medals a nation got (i.e. with rank and nation). ? Christian75 (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Christian75: great question. Below is a quick proof of concept. This is taken from Australia_at_the_Olympics#Medals_by_summer_sport (note that red links are due to {{gamesSport}} using PAGENAME). The only change that would need to be made is to add a {{{hide_rank}}} param that would hide the rank row. That is a pretty easy change to make. There are almost definitely other small changes that would need to be made, but I don't see anything that would prevent the two from being merged. Thoughts? --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
RankSportGoldSilverBronzeTotal
1 Swimming606464188
2 Athletics21262673
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Sandbox has been deployed. Module not needed now. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary lua module, can be implemented in Wikitext (Wikitext version written in sandbox). {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some of the code here can be put to use at Template_talk:WPBannerMeta#Links_from_redirects? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).