Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 11

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 19. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete it. Kevinhanit (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Steel1943, If you delete it, then what would you substitute it with? Kevinhanit (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thanks for the update. It is a transferable template that goes with the article of the Current Ontario Legislature. It makes it much easier to read the article while updating it as this section is extremely long when edited. Kevinhanit (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This template is ugly to look and and difficult to read even on a computer, let alone a phone. That said it's better off as a template as it would make editing the article very difficult. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete The markup stored here is no more complicated than any other article with a wikitable directly in the wikitext, of which there are many, so this is just like any other single-use template. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete Seems to me that this is much too detailed stuff for Wikipedia. Substitute back in and then there can be a discussion there as to whether this is needed or not. Either way, it shouldn't be a template. Nigej (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This one should be substituted and deleted Kevinhanit (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specific-source template with no article-space transclusions and unclear future use. Delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Even more one-transclusion election templstes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Election templates with one transclusion each. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Map with one article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to remove the <imagemap>...</imagemap>. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image map with one article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; small image-map without a lot of code, so there's no reason to keep it separate. Nyttend (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace with image and delete - the image with a clever facility so that you can place the cursor and the name of the person pops up. However, the name are on the image anyway, so seems pointless, especially since when I try it the wrong name often pops up. Nigej (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specific-source template with one transclusion and no obvious ability to be used elsewhere. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This will break all the old versions of the articles in the history, though. My memory of these are that they were common at the time, because the code is so easy to break if they're editable in article space. One stray character and they break. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.3% of all FPs 05:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

navigation template for an award without article The Banner talk 19:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

navigation template for an award without article The Banner talk 19:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

navigation template for an award without article The Banner talk 18:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant as discussed here Cards84664 (talk) 08:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. The previous TFD still stands - if the merger hasn't been finished then it should be added to WP:TFD/H so someone can take care of it. Primefac (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Hindu leader with Template:Infobox religious biography.
Already a wrapper, No distinct parameter, WP:INFOCOL. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 03:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 18. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is content hiding out in the template space without any obvious reason, and seems to have quite a bit of unnecessary complexity. It should be substed into each of the articles as appropriate and then deleted. Izno (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused template Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update after Andy Dingley WP:BOLDly reverted my change: Template with nothing but an image that can and should be moved directly to the article. There is not reason for an infobox template to house a single image for one article. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Template:Infobox Venus crater after replacing with Template:Infobox crater data. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Venus crater with Template:Infobox crater data.
Only a couple of extra params that can be easily passed directly. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).